Searching for sustainable alternatives to the ‘current frenzy of Development and Industrialization’
in India which can fulfill the most basic needs of common man - food and water..

Sunday, 27 March 2011

Case study Suicides among farmers: Maharashtra state


Maharashtra state : Case study Suicides among farmers
from Srijit Mishra Report Submitted to the Government of Maharashtra
(Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai,26 January 2006) 




The small and marginal farmers also bear the brunt of unavailability of water and its associated yield uncertainty. Linking of the national market with international markets has also increased the price uncertainty. a bad monsoon leading to crop failure or a glut in the market can put him into a quagmire of indebtedness and crashing of dreams. The farmer cannot get his daughter/sister married, he cannot send his children to college for higher education or he cannot meet health expenses for the family members to mention a few of his responsibilities. This brings about a feeling of dejection and failure among some farmers who in their moments of despair think that life is not worth living any more and they end up committing suicide. 


In particular, we ask  the following questions. What is the nature of the current agrarian crisis? Is it largely related with failed cultivation? Is it also associated with rural credit scenario?  Is there a withdrawal of state support from the rural agrarian scenario? Is there a geographical concentration of suicides? Is it of seasonal nature? Is it high among certain social group (age, caste, education and land size owned) that is aggressive in its pursuit of attaining economic well being? Is indebtedness an important risk factor? What are the other socio-economic risk factors?



Maharashtra state, the results are somewhat similar – linear trend growth rate for production of Cereals is negative. The increase in area under Sugarcane in the despite the fact that yield of Sugarcane is lower 
than the state’s average.



In 2004-05, despite delay in rain, there has been record production of Cotton. It is estimated at 232 lakh bales for India, an increase of about 70 lakh bales from the previous year. The situation is also good in Maharashtra where it is estimated to be more than 52 lakh bales  from 31 lakh bales in the previous year. This increase in production of Cotton  has been worldwide leading to a fall in prices of Cotton. considering the insecticide usage in Jowar, Tur and Soyabean as proxies for its usage in Cereals, Pulses and Oilseeds one can calculate that from across five crop groups, Cotton accounts for more than 89 per cent of the total expenses for insecticides. The farmer receives the MSP if the produce is of fair average quality and if it is sold in authorised centres. In practice, farmers  sell the produce in the open market where the prevailing price is lower than the MSP. Office bearers involved in grading and weighing took to rentseeking activities. The farmers paid commission to middlemen at the procurement centres.There emerged a class of traders in the guise of farmers. The farmer sold his produce to a trader-farmer at a lower price. The payment to  farmers was delayed and staggered. In 2004-5, there was an increase in cotton production all over the world and open market prices fell much below the MSP.  Price paid per quintal (average fair quality of long staple) was about Rs.2500, but payment was not immediate. Many farmers sold their produce in the open market at Rs.1900 or even lower. A perusal of the all India situation suggests that gross fixed capital formation in agriculture as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) declined from 3.1  per cent in the early eighties (1980-5, which also coincides with the sixth plan) to 1.6 per cent in recent times (1997-2002, which also coincides with the ninth plan). During the same period, gross fixed capital formation in agriculture as a proportion of total gross fixed capital formation declined from 13.1 per cent to 7.4 per cent.. Information on farmers’ indebtedness across states from the National Sample Survey Organisation (59th round) survey of January-December 2003, the results of which were released in May 2005. It shows that more  than half of the  rural households in Maharashtra are farmers and more than half of the farmer households are indebted. In Maharashtra, compared to the all India average, the proportion of farmers is less but that of indebted farmers is more. Within Maharashtra as well as in the all India scenario, a relatively greater proportion of the other backward caste and the other caste farmer households seem to have loans. Nearly three-fifths of the farmer households in Maharashtra depend on cultivation as their source of income and this proportion is slightly more among the indebted farmers. There are about three features separating out Maharashta from the all India average and the three states of Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Punjab.  



International and Domestic Policies Impact on Cotton Prices in India Excess international supply at a lower price is also because of direct and indirect subsides leading to dumping by the United States of America (USA). During the period 1998 to 2003 Cotton export prices from USA were lower than their cost of production by more than 50 per cent on average and had reached a maximum of 65 per cent in 2002 (Murphy, Lilliston and Lake, 2005).  As against this, domestic policies in India have led to removal
of quantitative restrictions and subsequently reduction of import tariff from 35 per cent in 2001-2 to 5 per cent in 2002-3. All these exposed the domestic prices of Cotton to the volatility of international prices. This has been adversely affecting the Cotton farmer. Similarly, excessive Cotton exports leading to an increase in yarn prices can adversely affect the handloom and power loom weavers. Thus, variable import and export tariffs
that guard movements in domestic prices against volatility in international prices could be of help to both producers and consumers  



  

Almost all the farmers have some outstanding loans taken either from formal or informal sources.Current operational loans are likely to be from moneylenders. There are a number of them operating from district headquarters, taluka headquarters and smaller ones operating at the  24 Suicide of Farmers in Maharashtra
village level. The village moneylender in  turn could have taken loans from larger moneylenders or input dealers  operating at the taluka/district level. The ones operating at the village level are either economically or politically or socially  dominant. Informal loan transactions could be in  dedhi. The debtor has to return the loan around harvest (within four to six months) and pay Rs.150 for loan of Rs.100. Similarly, there is sawai (payment of Rs.125 for loan of Rs.100).  



Another popular form of loans for agricultural and social purposes is at an interest rate of Rs.10/Rs.5 per month. In this case the interest is calculated after the principal is returned. For a loan that is repaid in 4-6 months, Rs.10 interest is similar to  dedhi whereas Rs.5 interest is similar to sawai. The difference crops in if for some unforeseen reasons like crop failure the loan is not repaid. Non-payment virtually leads to rewriting of a fresh loan with some additional credit being  given during the start of the  next agricultural season. The 
cumulative interest paid will be lower under  dedhi/sawai than under an interest rate of Rs.10/Rs.5 per month. 
  
The rewriting of old loans as fresh loans makes the debtor feel that the old loan is written off and he is being given a new loan. During this rewriting of loan the debtor is also given some additional credit. Thus, the debtor is made to understand that on the loan he is taking he pays an interest of  dedhi,  sawai, or Rs.10/Rs.5 per month. As against this, loans from formal sector cumulate over time and the absolute difference between amount taken and amount repaid can become higher than dedhi/sawai. For instance, at 14 per cent compound 
interest per annum, non-payment of loan for a little more than 3 years (say, 38 months) will be higher than dedhi and non-payment for 2 years will be higher than sawai. 



A conventional form of giving loan is through mortgaging of land. Creditors now consider it risky because fatality like suicides can lead to cancellation of such contracts. They have come up with a new design. They insist on sale of land with a verbal (not legal) promise that it will be sold back to the debtor after the loan is repaid.  If required, legal registration expenses on both counts are borne by the debtor.



The difficulty in selling their produce at the Government procurement centres. the presence of middlemen 
who take 1.5-3.0 per cent as commission. indicated the delayed payments for produce sold at Government procurement centers. also feel that the price they receive for their produce is inappropriate.



many people have migrated out in search of jobs.These included people those who have land and also those who are landless. Some of the migrants and their family members said that work is not available near the villages, and hence, they had to go to far off places.










India agriculture is monsoon dependent.


Suicide in Maharashtra



suicides in Maharashtra suggests that for males 31 per cent is due to family problems, 8 per cent is due to insanity, 24 per cent is due to other illness, 11per cent is due to economic reasons, 1 per cent is due to love affairs, 2 per cent is due to female victimization and the remaining 23 per cent is due to other reasons. For females, 41 per cent is due to family problems, 8 per cent is due to insanity, 20 per cent is due to other illness, 3 per cent is due to economic reasons, 2 per cent is due to love affairs, 12 per cent is due to female victimization and the remaining 12 per cent is due to other reasons.  For male suicide deaths: 34 per cent were by consuming insecticides, 8 per cent were by consuming other poison, 10 per cent were by drowning, 7 
per cent were by self-immolation and the remaining 8 per cent were by other methods. For female suicide deaths, 30 per cent were by consuming insecticides, 8 per cent were by consuming other poison, 18 per cent were by hanging, 15 per cent were by drowning, 26 per cent were by self-immolation and the remaining 3 per cent were by other methods. This shows that across gender there are some differences.  



The total number of farmer suicides increased from 1083 in 1995 to 4147 in 2004. The increase was largely because of 288 per cent increase in male farmer suicides from 978 to 3799. During this period, male farmer suicides as a proportion of total male suicides in Maharashtra increased from 14 per cent to 38 per cent. SMR for male farmers more than trebled from 17 in 1995  to 53 in 2004, but for females the trend fluctuated to reach a peak of 12 in 2001 but thereafter it has been declining. Age-adjusted SMR for males increased from 17 in 1995 to  about 21 in 2001 and has remained at that level for the remaining three years whereas age-adjusted SMR for females reached a peak of 14 in 1998, but thereafter it has been declining.
The size-class of land owned in suicide case households is that 14 per cent are marginal, 39 per cent are small farmers, 21 per cent semi-medium, 15 per cent medium, 4 per cent are large and 7 per cent have not given information on their land.ownership.

higher suicides among SCs and STs and lower among ‘other’ castes. For all castes, the ratio of sample to population proportion indicates relatively higher suicides among marginal size-class and small size-class of farmers and lower suicides among ‘other’ size-class of farmers. In 79 per cent of the cases, suicide was committed by consuming insecticide/pesticide. It is said that Cotton cultivation in about 8 million hectares occupies 5 per cent of total arable land in India, but uses 54 per cent of pesticides. a hospital that can treat emergencies like poisoning is on an average more than 20 kilometres away This means that the time taken to reach a treatment centre in these hilly regions can easily be more than an hour. This delay can prove fatal.



Suicidal factors.  fall in economic  position (74 per cent). Taking loans can be associated with indebtedness. Loans per se will not lead to a fall in economic position, but if it reaches a stage that will lead  to sale of assets then it can be associated with a fall in economic position. Similarly, a fall in economic position can also lead greater reliance on credit, increasing the debt burden. 



Most of the households are nuclear, but the proportion of joint families is slightly higher in the non-suicide control group. Despite a slightly higher proportion of nuclear families, it is intriguing that the average family size, after including the deceased individual, is higher among suicide case households. This is largely due to a relatively greater size in average number of females. The average number of members in occupation is higher among the suicide households, but this being the situation when the survey was conducted it could indicate coping strategy after the death of the main breadwinner.







Agriculture being the sole purpose accounts for 65 per cent of the outstanding debt in suicide case households  Marriage being the sole  purpose accounts for 18 per cent of the total outstanding debt of suicide case households.


Suicide Cases Eligible for Receiving Compensation.

all farmers who committed suicides are not investigated for compensation. In 2004, police records indicated that there were 4147 suicides of those whose profession is self-employed in agriculture.

The surviving members of a deceased
individual’s family are considered for receiving compensation of Rs.1 lakh if the following 
three conditions are satisfied: 
•  The deceased was a farmer and its proof lies in ownership of land, 
•  The deceased was indebted when the incident took place 
•  Indebtedness was the cause of suicide  

On land ownership, there are 
differences in de facto and  de jure ownership of land. Land is not in the deceased individual’s name; it is in his/her father or spouse’s name. Two individuals from the same family have separated and cultivate independently, but legally the lands are still under a single ownership. The legal landowner may not be residing in the village and might have rented the land out to tenants for cultivation. On indebtedness, one observed that almost all those interviewed had some or  the other loans. It is easy to investigate and verify institutional loans, but not so when the amount is from informal sources like a moneylender  or a trader-cum-moneylender. More so, after the demise of the debtor when the interest rates and collection practices by the creditor are likely to come under scrutiny. There can be practical difficulties in identifying cause  based on circumstantial evidence because the deceased is no longer among us. Given this limitation, any investigation that forms the basis 
for compensation will have to  sort out two possible errors.  First, it should not exclude genuine cases from being given compensation. Second, it should not include those that do not deserve to receive compensation. Any compensation criteria or  investigation should keep in mind that both errors should be minimised, but exclusion error should be considered as more serious.



From the suicide cases under analysis, basic particulars of the deceased indicate that 91per cent were males, 71 per cent were below  50 years of age, 80 per cent were currently married, 39 per cent completed their matriculation or higher education, 58 per cent had more than 10 years of experience in farming, and in 79 per cent of the cases the method of committing suicide was by consumption of insecticide/pesticide.The interrelated and co-existing socio-economic stressors identified in order of frequency are indebtedness (87 per cent), deterioration of economic status (74 per cent), conflict with other members in the family (55 per cent), crop failure (41 per cent), decline in social position (36 per cent), burden of daughter’s/sister’s marriage (34 per cent), suicide in a nearby village (32 per cent), addictions (28 per cent), change in behaviour (26 per cent), dispute with neighbours/others (23 per cent), health problem (21 per cent), a recent death in the family (10 per cent), history of suicide in family (6 per cent), other family members being ill (3 per cent). Comparing suicide case and non-suicide control households, one observes that the former have slightly higher proportion of nucleus families, have a higher average family size (particularly, greater number of females), ownership of assets and access to basic amenities is lower, and more  importantly the average amount of loan is much higher and the average value of produce is lower.



In Maharashtra, gross value addition is relatively higher for Fruits & Vegetables and Sugarcane. Traditionally, Cotton has been the cash crop for farmers in most of the suicidal case. Over the years, profitability from Cotton has declined. Some of the reasons are: high subsidies by the USA leading to price distortions, low import tariffs in India, and failure of the MCPS in Maharashtra. Withdrawal of the state is evident from declining public investment  in agriculture, poor government agricultural extension service, diminishing role of formal institutions in rural financial market among others. The farmer now depends on the input dealer for advice leading to supplier-induced demand and on informal sources of credit with greater interest burden.


Suggestions:


o Credit market needs immediate attention. Reduce interest rates charged to the farmer



o Flow of Credit to Agriculture and Related Activities from the Banking System.


o There should be strict supervision by formal institutions to prevent diversion of  loans given for this purpose.



o Enabling the formation of an information bureau will help formal institutions to judge credit worthiness of an 
individual. When moneylenders operate in a village, they take the help of a prominent person of the village to gather information on credit worthiness of an individual and at times also use their influence to recover loans. In return, they pay him a commission.



o The farmer’s problem is rooted in his exposure to  risk – yield as well as price shocks. Insurance schemes may be devised to mitigate these. Crop insurance will be linked with yield risk. Income insurance will address the poor returns, particularly for marginal and small farmers and also tenants. The poor returns could be because of poor prices, low yields or high transaction costs arising out of low quantity of produce. 



o A risk mitigation fund can be generated to finance the three different insurance schemes – crop, credit and income – or any other appropriate risk mitigation scheme. This fund will have contribution from the Government and can also be drawn from the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF).



o Where  agriculture is largely rainfall dependent, strategies to increase irrigation potential (particularly, through watershed development), should be devised so as to provide scope to increase value addition.



o The important cash crops of this region are Cotton and Soyabean. To reduce the vulnerability, the farmer should have more options and be able to go beyond these crops. Policies that can make diversification of cropping pattern feasible should be put into place. Inter cropping, fitting two crops, crop rotation and horticulture should be encouraged. Better water and land management will also help in attaining this objective.



Inputs in the form of seeds, pesticides and fertilisers sold to farmers could be of spurious quality. There is no regulatory mechanism. We came across situations where farmers were advised by traders to go in for a third sowing – a case of supplier-induced-demand.  The private  traders should be regulated.



o It will be beneficial on  two counts - to reduce costs associated with pesticides and fertilizers and reduce the availability of pesticides for committing suicide. We have also observed its successful practice in two cases during our survey. Replication of such experiments should be encouraged. For instance, shifting from inorganic to organic farming will give low returns in the initial two to three years. This acts as a deterrent for marginal and small farmers. Compensating them during initial years would help.


o The farmer is exposed to price fluctuations, increase the import tariff.



o Good marketing network can reduce transaction costs. It will also provide non-farm employment opportunities with agricultural linkages.



o A large proportion of rural  population being dependent on agriculture (cultivators and agricultural labourers) indicates that there are not many avenues of diversifying sources of income. Agro-based industries and other non-farm opportunities should be increased.



o Encourage bio-pesticides and phase out chemical pesticides within a time frame. Some of the above-mentioned practices have helped reduce organophosphorous poisoning deaths in Sri Lanka. 



o One of the reasons for indebtedness is expenses associated with marriages in the family. A related risk factor observed is the difficulty in conducting daughter’s/sister’s marriage when faced with an economic crisis like crop loss. Initiate involvement of civil society  to discuss and bring  about changes in the society by curtailing huge expenses on marriages and other social functions.



o  Healthcare needs and higher educational requirements also lead to credit requirement and indebtedness. Poor infrastructure also adds to transaction costs in terms of storage and marketing. Poor transportation can also lead to delay in seeking 78  Suicide of Farmers in Maharashtra healthcare during times of emergency.

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Paradoxical situation prevails in India


A seemingly paradoxical situation prevails in India as regards domestic consumption of rice and 
wheat, the two main staple cereals. Domestic demand is being met, exports continue and the FCI is finding it difficult to ‘unload’ its large stocks. At the same time, despite the FCI’s public distribution system (PDS), substantial sections of the poor (both rural and urban), in certain states, are not getting adequate amounts of cereals to eat. Several reasons account for this: 


First, the very poor do not have sufficient cash income to buy the food in the quantities they need, i.e. their ‘need’ does not translate into ‘demand’ that manifests itself ‘as the ability to pay the prevailing market price’; 


Second, the poorest in the rural areas tend to be either landless or have too little land, making it impossible to grow the amounts of food they need; 


Third, retail sales prices in the PDS-retail outlets cannot be lowered below the guaranteed minimum procurement prices that the FCI is obliged to pay the farmers; 


Four, corrupt officials collude with traders in ‘capturing’ the grain meant for the most vulnerable and helpless in society (e.g. the tribal peoples).  

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

Rice



Rice is grown in many regions across India. For about 65% of the people living in India, rice is a staple food for them. Rice is essential to life in India. It is a part of nearly every meal, and it is grown on a majority of the rural farms.


The god Shiva called rice Vrihi, in Sanskrit. India is one of the original centres of rice cultivation.
The rice harvesting area in India is the world's largest. Indian rice cultivation is found in all states, but West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Bihar are the major producing states. The early Kharif growing season lasts from March-May to June-October; the mid-Kharif season from June-October to November-February, and the Rabi season from November-February to March-June.
About 600 improved varieties of indica rice have been released for cultivation since 1965, but Basmati rice is still planted over large areas. Rice-based production systems provide the main income and employment for more than 50 million households.
Rice is the staple food for 65% of the total population in India. The Indian population was about 1 billion people in 2000 and is still growing at a high rate (1.7% per year). Although the country exports several varieties of rice, many scientists have expressed concern that current Indian rice production techniques cannot sustain the growing domestic population. India has a large number of rice dishes and many of them are very simple to prepare. Indian pilaf rice is very flavourful and fluffy when cooked with Basmati rice.

India is the world's second largest producer of white rice, accounting for 80% of all world rice production. Rice is India's preeminent crop, and is the staple food of the people of the eastern and southern parts of the country. Production increased from 53.6 million tons in FY 1980 to 74.6 million tons in FY 1990, a 39 percent increase over the decade. By FY 1992, rice production had reached 111 million tons, second in the world only to China with its 182 million tons. Since 1950 the increase has been more than 350 percent. Most of this increase was the result of an increase in yields; the number of hectares increased only 40 percent during this period. Yields increased from 1,336 kilograms per hectare in FY 1980 to 1,751 kilograms per hectare in FY 1990. The per-hectare yield increased more than 262 percent between 1950 and 1992. Andhra Pradesh is the top most rice-producing state in the country.

Some important facts about rice in Indian Scenario are as:
Agriculture is the main source of income for families in India. Farms cover over half the land and almost three-quarters of that land is used to grow the two major grains: rice and wheat.
India is the second leading producer of rice in the entire world, preceded only by China.
India's annual rice production is around 85-90 million tons. Annual consumption, is around 85 million tons.
In India, Rice is cultivated in both seasons - Winter and Summer.
West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Orissa, Assam, Karnataka and Haryana are the major producing states. More than 50% of total production comes from the first four states.
Food Corporation of India purchases around 20 to 25% of the total rice production in the country both under levy from the rice mills and directly in the form of paddy from the farmers at Minimum Support Prices announced by the Govt.
More than 4000 varieties of rice are grown in India.
India is the world's largest exporter of Basmati rice to Saudi Arabia and other Middle East Countries, Europe, and the United States.
India has the potential to export one million tons of Basmati rice.
Major destinations for Indian non-basmati, white/parboiled rice are Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines, Nigeria, South Africa, Ivory Coast, and other African countries.
India's population is expected to be 1.2 billion by 2012. The demand for rice in India is projected at 128 million tonnes for the year 2012 and will require a production level of 3,000 kg/ha significantly greater than the present average yield of 1,930 kg/ha.

Major constraints to rice production that India
 faces are land, water, labour and other inputs such as fertilisers, pesticides and insecticides, and even high quality germplasm, without affecting the already degraded and stressed agricultural environment. The problems/constraints in rice production vary from state to state and area to area.

Some of the major problems in rice cultivation
About 78% of the farmers are small and marginal in the country and they are poor in resource.
The problems of flash floods, water logging/ submergence due to poor drainage are very common in East India.
Continuous use of traditional varieties due to the non-availability of seeds and farmers lack of awareness about high yielding varieties.
Low soil fertility due to soil erosion resulting in loss of plant nutrients and moisture.
Low and imbalanced use of fertilizers, low use efficiency of applied fertilizers particularly in the North-Eastern and Eastern States.
The Eastern region experiences high rainfall and severe flood almost every year which lead to heavy loss.
Heavy infestation of weeds and insects/pests.
Delay in monsoon onset often results in delayed and prolong transplanting and sub-optimum plant population (Mostly in rainfed lowlands).
In the years of scanty or adverse distribution of rainfall, the crop fails owing to drought etc.

Industry vs farmers: How it hurts India



Industry vs farmers | How it hurts India


on LIVE MINT.com
Posted: Wed, Sep 15 2010. 5:45 PM IST
Reuters


New Delhi: As India rapidly industrializes, the government and private firms are seeking large tracts of farm land to build factories, power plants and highways, sparking off violent protests by farmers and others.
Why is land a big issue?
For many Indians, land is the only asset or social security that they possess and is a mark of social standing. Nearly 60% of India’s 1.2 billion citizens depend on farming for a living and each hectare of farmland supports five people.
Most projects require huge amounts of land. A proposed steel mill by South Korea’s Posco in Orissa will be built on 1,600 hectares. A six-lane highway between the Taj Mahal city of Agra and New Delhi will require 43,000 hectares.
Compensation ranges from between $4,300 a hectare, in the case of top steelmaker ArcelorMittal’s proposed plant of over 4,400 hectares in Jharkhand, to $14,600 per hectare, offered to farmers displaced by Posco’s Orissa mill.
Despite the seemingly attractive prices, farmers have few other livelihood options and land taken over for industrialization has been blamed for displacing hundreds of thousands of people.
Protests against land being taken over have become more visible as the economy expands and the rich-poor gap widens.
What does the law say?
The land acquisition law gives the state the right to take over land for public purposes with little compensation.
Critics say the government interprets “public” to include private investments and this amounts to land-grabbing. They want private firms to buy the land from the owners at market rates.
India is considering a new law which would guarantee market or higher rates.
Congress chief Sonia Gandhi last week threw her support for greater land rights for farmers, following up after her son, Rahul Gandhi, extracted a promise from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to pass legislation this year that is seen benefiting farmers.
What is at stake?
Analysts cite problems in acquiring land as the biggest hindrance to rapid industrialisation of Asia’s third-largest economy, pointing to several stalled highways, power utilities and factories.
Prominent amongst these are multi-billion dollar investments by top steelmakers like ArcelorMittal, South Korea’s Posco and Tata Steel.
Protests over mining on tribal land in Orissa have stalled plans of British-based mining group Vedanta Resources Plc to extract bauxite.
Who benefits and who pays?
Proponents say setting up industries and infrastructure will boost economic growth to double-digit rates which are needed to pull out of poverty the hundreds of millions of Indians who live on less than $1.25 a day.
They say more jobs will be created, shifting people from farms to the higher-paying industrial and service sectors, and that this will deepen the domestic market for goods and services.
Opponents point at the land system that has multiple layers of tenancy and where the peasant or farm labourer is often not the owner of the land and hence receives no compensation. They also question the benefits of industrialization, saying displaced people do not get the jobs that may be created as they do not have the required skills or qualifications.
How are other countries faring?
China faces similar problems over land rights and property seizures, with an increase in the number of clashes between peasants and local government.
Some analysts have warned the confrontation could ignite broader popular demands that challenge the Communist Party’s hold over 750 million rural residents.
What are the security implications?
Maoist rebels have tapped into the resentment of tribal and rural citizens who have been displaced from their land as a result of industrial projects.
They have been linked to protests that forced Tata Motors to shift the site of a plant to build the world’s cheapest car. The rebels have also sided with farmers opposing a $3 billion chemicals hub complex and a steel plant planned by India’s No 3 steelmaker JSW Steel, among others.
A government panel has said forcible acquisitions could shake the faith of citizens in the rule of law and would have serious consequences for internal security.
How does it affect farm output?
India’s food productivity is nearly stagnant and using farm land for other purposes means the country cannot raise farm output rapidly enough. This could leave it vulnerable to food shortages in times of a bad harvest, forcing it to go for costly imports.